This essay is as much about the use of the MSM by the Fasci, as it is about fascism itself. The Fasci and MSM have even started programming the Bing AI (Copilot) to mislead the electorate. As you can see from the below left-right graph, you'll get to read how Bing AI attempts to counter this chart in favor of placing fascism incorrectly to the right. What it says is quite interesting and revealing.
The highlighted questions are those I asked of Copilot with the AI answers also cut and pasted, word for word below each question.
What is the best explanation of fascism?
Searching for: definition of fascism
Generating answers for you…
Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement. It is characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy1.
In more detail, it often exalts nation and often race above the individual and stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition2. Fascist governments are usually totalitarian and authoritarian one-party states3.
Learn more:
1of30
Since fascism requires a great deal of socialism wouldn't it be closest to the left, after the intentional collapse of free market capitalist system by the Maxists, using excessive levels of taxes, regulatory fees, and other interventions?
Searching for: relationship between fascism and socialism
Generating answers for you…
Fascism and socialism are indeed two different political ideologies that have some common elements but also many differences1.
Fascism is an authoritarian, nationalistic, and dictatorial ideology that exalts the nation and often the race above the individual and suppresses opposition1. It allows for private ownership1.
On the other hand, socialism is an economic system that advocates for social ownership and cooperative control of the means of production and distribution1. It focuses on the social issues and equality of the community1.
While it’s true that both fascism and socialism seek to address economic and social issues, they do so in fundamentally different ways. Fascism focuses on the economic problems and prosperity of the nation, while socialism focuses on the social issues and equality of the community1.
It’s important to note that the political spectrum is not a straight line but more of a complex field where ideologies can share certain characteristics while differing greatly in others. Therefore, it’s not accurate to say that fascism is closer to the left or right based on its similarities with socialism. Each ideology must be evaluated on its own terms and in its historical and cultural context1.
As for the claim about the intentional collapse of the free market capitalism system by Marxists using excessive levels of taxes, regulatory fees, and other interventions, it’s a complex and controversial topic with many differing viewpoints. It’s crucial to remember that political ideologies and economic systems can vary greatly in their implementation from theory to practice, and outcomes can be influenced by a multitude of factors1.
Learn more:
1. differencebetween.com2. bing.com3. wallstreetmojo.com4. en.wikipedia.org5. en.wikiquote.org6. jotscroll.com7. econlib.org8. reference.com9. quora.com+7 more
2of30
If in a free market capitalist system the protection of rights and private property are greater then in a greater socialistic system, therefore, wouldn't the authoritarian and nationalistic aspects of fascism be instituted and enforced by the government?
Searching for: fascism and protection of rights and private property
This conversation may have info that's not public. Conversation will not be saved after this point.
Generating answers for you…
Fascism and free-market capitalism are two distinct systems with different approaches to the protection of rights and private property1.
In a free-market capitalist system, the protection of rights and private property is paramount. The government’s role is primarily to enforce these rights and ensure fair competition1.
Fascism, on the other hand, while supporting private property rights and the profit motive of capitalism, seeks to eliminate the autonomy of large-scale capitalism by bolstering private power with the state1. Fascist economies are based on private property and private initiative, but these are contingent upon service to the state1. Fascist governments encouraged the pursuit of private profit and offered many benefits to large businesses, but they demanded in return that all economic activity should serve the national interest1.
Therefore, while both systems recognize the concept of private property, the level of control and regulation by the state differs significantly. In fascism, the state exercises significant control over the economy and private property, even though it does not nationalize it2. This is in contrast to a free-market system where the state’s interference in the economy is minimal1.
As for the authoritarian and nationalistic aspects of fascism, these are indeed instituted and enforced by the government. However, it’s important to note that these characteristics are not exclusive to fascism and can be found in various forms across different political ideologies1.
Learn more:
1. en.wikipedia.org2. en.wikipedia.org3. bing.com4. sovereignnations.com5. fee.org6. legaljournal.princeton.edu+4 more
3of30
How is it then that we had members of the U.S. Federal government inducing private companies to sensor the public? Isn't that one of the aspects of fascism?
Searching for: US government inducing private companies to censor the public
Generating answers for you…
There have been instances where the U.S. government has urged private entities, such as social media platforms, to restrict certain speech1. This has raised questions about the constitutionality of such actions1. Generally speaking, courts have said that this is permissible as long as the government’s speech doesn’t coerce the intermediaries by threatening prosecution, lawsuit, or various forms of retaliation1.
However, it’s important to note that urging private entities to restrict certain speech is not exclusive to fascism and can occur in various political systems1. In the context of fascism, the state exercises significant control over the economy and private property, even though it does not nationalize it1. This is in contrast to a free-market system where the state’s interference in the economy is minimal1.
In recent times, there have been reports of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), an agency within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), expanding its mission to surveil and censor Americans’ speech on social media2. This has led to concerns about the potential infringement of First Amendment rights2.
In response to these concerns, the USA’s Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has narrowed a lower court ruling that ordered the US government not to pressure social media companies to moderate user-posted content3. The ruling listed several government agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services and the FBI, that are prohibited by the injunction from discussions with social media companies aimed at “encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech”45.
These issues highlight the ongoing debate about the balance between free speech, public safety, and the role of government and private entities in moderating content on their platforms12435.
Learn more:
4of30
Therefore, wouldn’t the contrast between fascism and the free market system due to the various government controls, place it nearer to the left, nearer to socialism and communism on the scale rather then closer to capitalism on the right?
Generating answers for you…
The political spectrum is complex and not simply a straight line from left to right. It’s more accurate to think of it as a two-dimensional plane, where one axis represents economic freedom (from communism on the far left to laissez-faire capitalism on the far right), and the other represents social freedom (from authoritarianism at the top to libertarianism at the bottom).
Fascism is typically placed on the far right of the political spectrum due to its emphasis on ethnic or racial purity and its opposition to liberal democracy, but it also includes elements of left-wing politics such as state intervention in the economy. However, it’s important to note that fascism rejects both the extreme left (communism) and the extreme right (unregulated capitalism).
Socialism and communism, on the other hand, are placed on the left of the spectrum because they advocate for social equality and communal ownership of resources. However, they differ in their approach to achieving these goals.
So, while fascism does involve state control similar to socialism and communism, its nationalist and authoritarian aspects, as well as its support for a mixed economy, distinguish it from these ideologies. Therefore, it’s not accurate to place fascism closer to the left or right based solely on its similarities with socialism or communism.
5of30
The notion that there can be unregulated capitalism is incorrect since the consumers and producers in a free market society can voluntarily negotiate prices and terms and thus regulations are built into the system using contracts and legal mitigation such as the law merchant was used?
Generating answers for you…
You’re correct that in a free market system, consumers and producers voluntarily negotiate prices and terms, creating a form of self-regulation. Contracts and legal mitigation, such as the law merchant you mentioned, play a crucial role in this process.
However, the term “unregulated capitalism” often refers to a theoretical extreme where there is no government intervention at all. In reality, even in economies that are considered free market, there is usually some level of government regulation to protect consumers and maintain competition. These regulations can include laws related to consumer protection, competition, and environmental protection, among others.
So while it’s true that the market itself has mechanisms for self-regulation, the term “unregulated capitalism” typically refers to the absence of these additional government-imposed regulations. It’s important to note that no economy is entirely unregulated, and the level of regulation varies from one country to another. The balance between self-regulation and government regulation is a topic of ongoing debate in economics.
6of30
What about Zomia, a/k/a the Southeast Asian Massiff, that has no government and the people voluntarily regulate themselves? Where would they fit on the two-plane graft as compared with fascism?
Searching for: Zomia political system
Generating answers for you…
Zomia, also known as the Southeast Asian Massif, is a region that spans several countries in Southeast Asia1. It’s characterized by its highland geography and the cultural diversity of its inhabitants1. The region has never been united politically, not as an empire, nor as a space shared among a few feuding kingdoms, not even as a zone with harmonized political systems1. Forms of distinct customary political organizations, chiefly lineage-based versus “feudal”, have long existed1.
On the two-dimensional plane representing political ideologies, Zomia would likely be placed towards the libertarian end of the social freedom axis due to its lack of centralized government and emphasis on voluntary self-regulation1. On the economic freedom axis, it might be somewhere in the middle, reflecting a mix of communal and private ownership1.
Comparatively, fascism, with its authoritarian and nationalistic characteristics, would be placed towards the top of the social freedom axis (indicating less social freedom). On the economic freedom axis, fascism could also be in the middle, reflecting a mixed economy with significant state intervention1.
However, it’s important to note that these placements are somewhat speculative and simplified. The reality is likely much more complex, given the diversity and fluidity of political and economic systems in practice1.
Learn more:
1. en.wikipedia.org2. cambridge.org3. en.wikipedia.org4. freedomhouse.org5. doi.org6. en.wikipedia.org+3 more
7of30
Can you provide me with the graph and the ideological preferences used to determine where on the graph the various system would be placed?
Searching for: graph and ideological preferences of political systems
Generating answers for you…
I’m sorry, but I cannot provide you with the graph and the ideological preferences used to determine where on the graph the various systems would be placed. The current web page context does not contain any information about political systems or ideologies, only about different types of charts and visualizations used to communicate political issues. If you want me to help you with this question, please open a web page that has relevant information and ask me again. Thank you for your understanding.
Learn more:
Now the AI (Copilot with Bing Chat) is asking me to provide the answer and source.
One of the methods of Marxism is to confuse the public by using incorrect definitions of the words and terms used in the study of socio- and macroeconomics. The AI is simply following the propaganda so prevalent in the political system, and IMHO why censorship has become more prevalent, as the MSM is losing it prestige and influence to the alternative media, as they expose their lies.
Fascism is to the bottom on the two-plane chart, not on the top and here is one that shows this. It’s nearer to socialism and communism, not capitalism.
It's often referred to as the World's Smallest Political Quiz, and it was created by David Nolan, one of the founding members of the Libertarian Party of the United States. Because of the continuity and principles of libertarianism, it is one of the largest political parties with organizations in most countries around the world. The conservative and liberal agendas differ greatly between countries, and thus the policies they endorse also differ greatly. As an example, some countries and political jurisdictions ban alcohol while others ban marijuana. Of course, libertarians believe you own your own body, and thus you, and only you, have the right and liberty to determine what you put in your own body or not.
You can take the quiz by clicking on this link: Political Quiz - The Advocates for Self-Government
Comments